tomshardware.co.uk
Read the full review
0
%
pcadvisor.co.uk
Reading: Specs AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual-core 5000+ processor 2.6 GHz 0.512 MB L2 Box Processors (ADO5000IAA5DD)
As an upgrade, the Athlon processors dont yet make sense. The chips themselves are expensive, and by the time youve factored in a motherboard and some extra DDR2 memory you could be looking at paying twice as much – especially if youre looking to b… As an upgrade, the Athlon processors dont yet make feel. The chips themselves are expensive, and by the time youve factored in a motherboard and some extra DDR2 memory you could be looking at paying doubly ampere much – specially if youre looking to b …Read the full review
80
%
![Bottom line](http://icecat.biz/static/images/reviews-bottomline.png)
AMDs 65nm CPUs consume less power and run cooler than their predecessors, but these were never particular problems for the Athlon 64 X2. Performance against the Core 2 Duo is the issue, and the move to 65nm doesnt improve this. Our 65nm chip overcloc… AMDs 65nm CPUs consume less power and run cooler than their predecessors, but these were never particular problems for the Athlon 64 X2. Performance against the Core 2 Duo is the issue, and the motion to 65nm doesnt improve this. Our 65nm chip overcloc …
69
%
![Bottom line](http://icecat.biz/static/images/reviews-bottomline.png)
One thing thats clear from the benchmarks in the previous pages is that if you already own an FX-60, there is no need to rush out and buy the new 5000+. We didnt receive the FX-62 from AMD so we cant say how well that will compete against the FX-60. Th… One thing thats clear from the benchmarks in the former pages is that if you already own an FX-60, there is no need to rush out and buy the new 5000+. We didnt receive the FX-62 from AMD so we cant say how well that will compete against the FX-60. thorium …
0
%
0
%
0
%
ixbtlabs.com
Read the full review
0
%
legitreviews.com
![Bottom line](http://icecat.biz/static/images/reviews-bottomline.png)
Our testing showed that when gaming at high resolutions the limiting factor is not the processor, but is actually the graphics card. This was shown to be true in three out of the six games that we benchmarked. We used the ATI Radeon X1900XTX graphics… Our testing showed that when gaming at high resolutions the specify factor is not the central processing unit, but is actually the graphics calling card. This was shown to be true in three out of the six games that we benchmarked. We used the ATI Radeon X1900XTX graphics …Read the full review
0
%
0
%
hardwaresecrets.com
Read the full review
0
%
techwarelabs.com
![Bottom line](http://icecat.biz/static/images/reviews-bottomline.png)
AMD has once again moved in the right direction with the release of AM2 with support for DDR2. While the performance gains are not as staggering as they were with the release of the Athlon, or the Athlon 64, they are still noticeable. Overall the conv… AMD has once again moved in the right direction with the release of AM2 with subscribe for DDR2. While the performance gains are not a staggering as they were with the release of the Athlon, or the Athlon 64, they are still detectable. Overall the conv …Read the full review
0
%
Bjorn3d.com
![Good](http://icecat.biz/static/images/reviews-good.png)
Excellent utilization of DDR-2 SDRAM, Decreased memory power consumption and heat production, Extremely fast and reliable, In-chip virtualization support, Decreased CPU core voltage and heat production… excellent utilization of DDR-2 SDRAM, Decreased memory office consumption and heat production, Extremely fast and authentic, In-chip virtualization back, Decreased CPU core electric potential and heat production …
![Bad](http://icecat.biz/static/images/reviews-bad.png)
Expensive (as are all highend CPUs)… expensive ( as are all highend CPUs ) …
![Bottom line](http://icecat.biz/static/images/reviews-bottomline.png)
AMD has done what we feel to be an outstanding job with the introduction of their socket AM2 lineup. The X2 5000+ we reviewed today completely surprised us from the standpoint of how well it performs, particularly in the realm of memory related benchm… AMD has done what we feel to be an outstanding job with the insertion of their socket AM2 batting order. The X2 5000+ we reviewed today completely surprised us from the point of view of how well it performs, particularly in the kingdom of memory related benchm …Read the full review
95
%
MotherBoards.org
![Bottom line](http://icecat.biz/static/images/reviews-bottomline.png)
This round shows the gap between Intel and AMD taking a wider gap in favor of AMD for the first time; to be candid the FX62 was a smoking gun as an out of box product. AMD has really made advancements the past year with new faster CPUs and better chips… This round shows the col between Intel and AMD taking a broad col in favor of AMD for the first clock ; to be candid the FX62 was a fume artillery as an out of box product. AMD has very made advancements the past year with modern fast CPUs and better chips …Read the full review
0
%
![Good](http://icecat.biz/static/images/reviews-good.png)
Priced Competitively, Dual Channel DDR2800, Lower Power and Heat Specs… Priced Competitively, Dual Channel DDR2800, Lower Power and Heat Specs …
![Bad](http://icecat.biz/static/images/reviews-bad.png)
Still 90nm, 2x512MB L2 Hampers Game Performance… hush 90nm, 2x512MB L2 Hampers Game Performance …
![Bottom line](http://icecat.biz/static/images/reviews-bottomline.png)
The launch of the Athlon 64 FX-62 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+ processors, while impressive in their own right, is almost secondary to the future potential of Socket AM2. Certainly, it is nice to see the higher performance and improved specifications of the… The launch of the Athlon 64 FX-62 and Athlon 64 X2 5000+ processors, while impressive in their own right, is about secondary to the future potential of Socket AM2. surely, it is courteous to see the higher performance and better specifications of the …
85
%
extremetech.com
![Good](http://icecat.biz/static/images/reviews-good.png)
Solid performance across the board; virtualization support; lower cost than the FX-62. solid performance across the display panel ; virtualization back ; lower price than the FX-62 .
![Bad](http://icecat.biz/static/images/reviews-bad.png)
Only 512KB of L2 cache per core; still pricey. only 512KB of L2 hoard per core ; still pricey .
![Bottom line](http://icecat.biz/static/images/reviews-bottomline.png)
If you cant quite afford an FX-62, youll still be pretty happy with the 5000+… If you cant quite afford an FX-62, youll calm be pretty happy with the 5000+ …Read the full review
80
%
tbreak.ae
![Bottom line](http://icecat.biz/static/images/reviews-bottomline.png)
One thing thats clear from the benchmarks in the previous pages is that if you already own an FX-60, there is no need to rush out and buy the new 5000+. We didnt receive the FX-62 from AMD so we cant say how well that will compete against the FX-60. Th… One thing thats clear from the benchmarks in the previous pages is that if you already own an FX-60, there is no indigence to rush out and buy the newfangled 5000+. We didnt receive the FX-62 from AMD so we cant say how well that will compete against the FX-60. thursday …Read the full review
0
%
neoseeker.com
![Bottom line](http://icecat.biz/static/images/reviews-bottomline.png)
Ok, that was a lot of work – and a lot of fun. Clearly AMD has delivered a very viable processor with the AM2 launch. The on-board DDR2 memory controller provides extremely low DDR2 latency that cannot be matched even by the excellent Intel 975X chips… Ok, that was a lot of work – and a draw of fun. Clearly AMD has delivered a identical viable central processing unit with the AM2 launch. The on-board DDR2 memory accountant provides extremely low DDR2 reaction time that can not be matched tied by the excellent Intel 975X chips …Read the full review
0
%
0
%
0
%
90
%