Car
Audio
Digital camera
Games
Painted Software
Robots
Smart watch
Tech news
ToolsOn wallpaper, the iPhone 12 Pro Max has the most impressive image capabilities to go steady in an Apple call. Read our recapitulation, performed under the brand-new version 4 of the DXOMARK Camera test protocol, to find out how it performs .
Key television camera specifications :
- Primary: 12 MP sensor (1.7µ photo sites), 26 mm-equivalent f/1.6-aperture lens, sensor shift OIS, PDAF
- Ultra-wide: 12 MP 1/3.6″ sensor, 13 mm-equivalent (14 mm measured) f/2.4-aperture lens
- Tele: 12 MP 1/3.4″ sensor, 65 mm-equivalent f/2.2-aperture lens, PDAF, OIS
- LiDAR depth sensing
- LED flash
- 4K Dolby Vision HDR video at 24/30/60 fps (2160p/30 fps tested)
About DXOMARK Camera tests: For scoring and analysis in our smartphone camera reviews, DXOMARK engineers capture and measure over 3000 test images and more than 2.5 hours of video both in controlled lab environments and in natural indoor and outdoor scenes, using the television camera ’ s default settings. This article is designed to highlight the most crucial results of our test. For more information about the DXOMARK Camera examination protocol, click here. More details on how we score smartphone cameras are available here .
Test summary
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
130
camera
138
photograph
68
soar
113
television
Apple ’ sulfur iPhones generally offer very good image performance but last class ’ south models have been pushed down in our rankings by the latest and greatest from early call makers. With the iPhone 12 Pro Max, Apple again storms the heights of our database, but doesn ’ t quite reach the top. Its impressive DXOMARK Camera grade of 130 lands it just outside the top three, but its excellent Photo sub-score of 138, based on strong performance with few stumbles, is second only to Huawei ’ south Mate 40 Pro as of this writing .
vulnerability is by and large accurate ( as you ’ five hundred hope ), specially on portraits, and tied down to identical broken inner light levels. Less impressive dynamic scope holds the photograph score back, however, as highlights and shadows tend to clip when the television camera faces scenes with a identical high brightness range. color is by and large pleasant, specially indoors, where a slightly ardent try is much flattering. however, in high dynamic range scenes, color is less reliable .
Autofocus is particularly fast and accurate, with the iPhone 12 Pro Max setting a newfangled high for this sub-score. Despite the larger detector, the main camera besides maintains enough astuteness of field ( and manages it properly ) to keep everyone in focus in our group test shots .
The telephone balances texture and noise better than the iPhone 11 Pro Max, and texture conservation is identical good, with the television camera hanging onto detail even as abstemious levels drop. noise is besides lower than we measured in its harbinger. But despite the improvements, the identical best of the competition hush manages to balance randomness and detail more dexterously .
Apple was an early proposer in simulating background blur with a give portrait mode and its latest feat in this iPhone delivers decent results, with reasonably good discipline separation, a natural-looking blur gradient, and consistent noise across the frame. however, that fancy LiDAR detector apparently international relations and security network ’ t the be-all and end-all of depth function, as we still see artifacts around unmanageable subjects like hair .
double artifacts are sanely well controlled, but the iPhone 12 Pro Max actually takes a belittled pace backwards from its predecessor, losing three points for this sub-score. Hue stir, discolor quantization, ringing, and ghosting are much visible if you ’ ra looking for them .
Indoors, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max captures detail images with pleasant color rendering The iPhone 12 Pro Max achieves a score of 68 in our new Zoom metric function, which combines the Wide and Tele scores. This is a substantial improvement over the 11 Pro Max ( which we retested with the new protocol ), but preferably far behind the best of the competition. This iPhone does quite well on the wide part of the equality, offering lots of coverage and good overall effigy quality ( with a few caveats ). At moderate rapid climb ratios, the phone ’ randomness capable tele-module does a identical adept speculate .
however, the iPhone 12 Pro Max can ’ t very compete on the long end of its soar with the best of its adversaries. Xiaomi, Huawei, and others have been pushing hard on extending the reach of phones with long focal-length tele-modules, while the iPhone is a modest 65 mm-equivalent .
exposure is accurate and line is well managed, apart from some foreground clipping 
Colors are bright and pleasant outdoors, specially when HDR processing is moderate .
With a Video score of 113, the iPhone 12 Pro Max ties for second topographic point in our video testing with the Huawei P40 Pro, leaving Huawei ’ south Mate 40 Pro at the top of the tilt. Apple adds Dolby Vision HDR support, which does indeed deliver high active range and pleasant tone map when played back on a compatible display. Dynamic stove is wide-eyed in general, though highlights can still clip in extreme situations .
texture and randomness are well balanced under most conditions, with first gear noise and batch of detail present when shooting outdoors or in centrist indoor light up. light levels have to get quite broken ahead noise becomes intrusive and detail drops. color is by and large pleasant, despite some slender white symmetry casts that are sometimes visible ( more so in very low light ) .
As with stills, video autofocus is accurate and fast, with quick and smooth shifts when subject distance changes. stabilization is besides effective, including when walk or pan .
even though exposure is by and large accurate, our testers noticed flimsy exposure instabilities under all conditions. Flare and color quantization besides show up sometimes, but overall video recording performance is excellent .
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, outdoor video
Photo scores explained
The iPhone 12 Pro Max achieves an excellent Photo score of 138, thanks to strong results across most trope quality attributes. In this segment, we take a closer look at how each sub-score was determined and compare image timbre against some key competitors .
Exposure and Contrast
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
93
111
Huawei P50 Pro
Best : Huawei P50 Pro ( 111 )
The iPhone 12 Pro Max ’ second Exposure performance is competitive with most other flagship offerings but does leave room for improvement when it comes to high dynamic roll scenes. prey vulnerability is by and large accurate, specially when it comes to faces .
In this backlit scene, both iPhones blow out the sky, though the 12 Pro Max maintains a better exposure on the models ’ faces. We besides see some flare in the iPhone shots .
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, blow highlights
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, float highlights, underexpose faces
Huawei P40 Pro, better exposure
The iPhone 12 Pro Max ’ s retentive grip on target exposure is on expose in the examples below. Both comparison devices, possibly lulled by the low-light conditions and the flannel backdrop, underexpose the subject ’ randomness face quite badly, while the 12 Pro Max does a better job of keeping it bright .
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, rebuff underexposure on face
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, worse underexposure on confront
Huawei P40 Pro, worse underexposure on face
Color
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
101
107
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Best : Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max ( 107 )
The iPhone 12 Pro Max earns a hearty tinge score. picture is by and large pleasant indoors and out ( though a little blue roll sometimes creeps in when outside ). Color rendering can stumble in high moral force range scenes, though, taking on an about cartoonish look. In the examples below, we have very dainty tinge on the foreground subject from the 12 Pro Max, but the HDR color in the setting looks off, as does the other model ’ second skin tone. The older iPhone does better with the background but underexposes the main discipline, while the Huawei manages a more balance approach path, albeit with a slightly exhausted spirit on the people .
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, leftover HDR coloring material render
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, benighted foreground
Huawei P40 Pro, balanced color but slightly washed out
Indoors, the iPhone tends towards the warm color rendering that Apple is known for, with broadly flattering results .
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, excellent color render
Huawei P40 Pro, slight yellow cast, less flattering skin tones
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G, good color, but very flimsy pink form in skin tones
Autofocus
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
109
Highest grade
Apple takes the autofocus crown with the iPhone 12 Pro Max, earning the highest score we ’ ve recorded to date. AF is flying and accurate under all conditions. One revelation of our newfangled trial protocol is that the luminosity range of a scene can have arsenic much an effect on AF operation as the overall light flush, and quite a few phones that exhibit excellent performance in uniform alight stumble when faced with a high dynamic range scene. But as we see in the chart below, the iPhone is unfazed by a 7 EV luminosity spread, delivering a tightly grouped bunch of timings that actually anticipate the shutter release by about a tenth of a second for a palpate of instantaneity. It ’ randomness fair to assume that this great autofocus performance is at least in character due to Apple ’ s newfangled LiDAR arrangement .
Autofocus comparison under outdoor light ( 1000 lux ) with 7 EV version
Apple besides manages depth of field well, something that ’ randomness increasingly an emergence as detector sizes increase in phones and fixed apertures get wide. In our tests with people at different distances, the iPhone did a dependable job of picking a stress point that maximizes pungency for both near and army for the liberation of rwanda subjects .
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, depth of field
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, craw, background national in focus
Huawei P40 Pro, depth of field
Huawei P40 Pro, crop, background discipline slightly out of focus
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G, depth of field
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G, crop, background subject slightly out of focus
Texture
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
101
111
Xiaomi Mi 11
Best : Xiaomi Mi 11 ( 111 )
Noise
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
75
99
Huawei P50 Pro
Best : Huawei P50 Pro ( 99 )
The iPhone 12 Pro Max earns a very good texture score, confirming observations that it holds onto contingent identical well, even as light up levels drop. It does better in this regard than the 11 Pro Max through most of the test range, and in the graph below, we see that it significantly beats the Samsung reference device at very low light levels, though it can ’ metric ton keep up with the Huawei when the lights go down .
texture comparison ( dashed lines represent deviation from average )
In the examples below under reasonably challenge indoor shuffle alight conditions ( the bright window in the background complicates things ), the iPhone 12 Pro Max does a perceptibly better job with ticket detail than its harbinger, though the Huawei surpasses both .
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, indoor texture
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, crop, thoroughly detail
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, indoor texture
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, crop, less detail
Huawei P40 Pro, indoor texture
Huawei P40 Pro, crop, excellent detail
The iPhone 12 Pro Max ’ s make noise performance is less impressive, at least by flagship standards, though it ’ s a definite improvement over its predecessor in humble light. In the chart below, we see that the Samsung has a higher service line noise deck and the new iPhone stays under it for most of the test range. The Huawei, on the other hand, generally keeps noise in better check than the early devices .
ocular make noise comparison
These lab results are have a bun in the oven out in the examples below. The newly iPhone retains more detail with less randomness than its predecessor, but the Huawei is more impressive than both ( despite some underexposure ) .
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, low-light make noise
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, crop, some noise visible
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, low-light noise
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, crop, more noise visible
Huawei P40 Pro, low-light noise
Huawei P40 Pro, crop, less noise visible
Artifacts
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
65
75
Google Pixel 4
Best : Google Pixel 4 ( 75 )
picture artifacts are fairly well controlled overall on the iPhone 12 Pro Max, but there is room for improvement. The call loses the most points in this sub-score for color quantization, which happens when color gradations that should be rendered smoothly aren ’ triiodothyronine, but ringing ( from oversharpening ) is besides an issue. other more minor effects include hue switch, ghosting, moiré, and fusion artifacts ( errors in merging data from multiple cameras ) .
In the exemplar below, we see color quantization and hue switch in the sky .
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, semblance quantization
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, craw, artificial color gradients
In this example, ghosting results from failing to account for apparent motion between stacked frames .
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, ghosting
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, crop, ghosting
Night
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
64
82
Huawei Mate 40 Pro+
Best : Huawei Mate 40 Pro+ ( 82 )
The iPhone 12 Pro Max is a able night shooter and an improvement over the 11 Pro Max, but it lags the very best of the competition. Exposures are good down to low light levels and dynamic roll is fairly wide. Colors are normally pleasant. In the example below, the iPhone manages a nice bright exposure and balances noise and detail better than the Samsung. Both the Samsung and the Huawei make slenderly darker exposures, but the P40 Pro ’ sulfur excellent night performance sets it aside from the other two .
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, flash off
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, cultivate, good detail and exposure
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G, flash off
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G, crop, broken exposure, more noise
Huawei P40 Pro, flash off
Huawei P40 Pro, crop, first gear noise, good detail, slenderly darkness exposure
When shooting portraits at night in car mood, Apple opts to keep the flash from firing, a option that some photographers might agree with but that can lead to underexposure in dim conditions .
Bokeh
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
70
80
Huawei P50 Pro
Best : Huawei P50 Pro ( 80 )
The iPhone 12 Pro Max shoots pleasing images in its portrait modality with model shallow depth of field. The bokeh effect is natural-looking, and the iPhone largely avoids the pitfalls that some competitors fall into when trying to render faces naturally in this mode : skin tones are pleasing and detail levels are good, though the Huawei character device, which truly excels at this flim-flam, does a little better at preserving details in the font .
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, pleasant bokeh effect
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, pleasant bokeh effect
Huawei P40 Pro, pleasant bokeh effect
The iPhone does a pretty good job of separating the subject from background, but like most devices, it does make mistakes around the edges, specially with difficult borders like hair. The LiDAR detector does not seem to make an enormous deviation here, at least not in normal faint ( Apple ’ s marketing highlights its ability to build depth maps in depleted light, but that ’ s not separate of our test protocol ) .
apart from boundary errors, which are reasonably typical, our testers besides noted that the iPhone on one occasion ignored foreground confuse wholly. Otherwise blur gradient is reasonably lifelike, though, and a dainty improvement over the 11 Pro Max .
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, outdoor bokeh
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, commodity astuteness estimate
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, outdoor bokeh
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, crop, beneficial depth estimate
Huawei P40 Pro, outdoor bokeh
Read more: Acer Aspire E5-573G Notebook Review
Huawei P40 Pro, snip, excellent depth appraisal
The new top-end iPhone is besides pretty effective at capturing bokeh pretense images in moo unaccented. It maintains both a natural bokeh effect and commodity detail even in very dense conditions, thanks to use of the LiDAR and night mood energizing in bokeh manner. Bokeh testing in low light is not presently part of our test protocol, as we mentioned above, but we have added a few low-light bokeh samples to our gallery at the end of this follow-up for you to look at .
Preview
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
77
80
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max
Best : Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max ( 80 )
When we introduced our preview benchmarking, Apple proved to be far ahead of the rival when it comes to accurately showing what you ’ ll get on the screen, and the iPhone 11 Pro Max had the highest preview score until nowadays. The iPhone 12 Pro Max and its non-Max sibling nowadays share the top smudge, but there ’ second still a batch of room for the diligence as a whole to grow in this metric unit, as even with this top-scoring device, what you see international relations and security network ’ metric ton precisely what you ’ ll get. In general, exposure in the preview visualize close approximates what is actually captured in the photograph ; dynamic scope is normally close as well, though it can be more express in the preview, as seen below .
preview : accurate exposure, some HDR
capture : wide moral force range
The bokeh effect in portrayal mood is previewed with only an approximation of the astuteness map, so the blur tends to spill over onto the topic more than in the final visualize. Zooming hasn ’ triiodothyronine been perfected so far, either, with jumps as you step between cameras and casual white balance and exposure instabilities .
preview : bokeh model in preview with overstate depth errors
capture : better depth estimate
Zoom scores explained
The iPhone 12 Pro Max achieves a Zoom score of 68, leaving it behind most of the flagship phones we ’ ve tested with this new protocol. The Zoom sexual conquest is a composite of broad and tele scores. In this section, we take a closer expect at how these sub-scores were achieved and compare zoom image quality against some key competitors .
Tele
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
87
140
Huawei P50 Pro
Best : Huawei P50 Pro ( 140 )
The iPhone 12 Pro Max outdoes its harbinger in this sub-score, but with the exception of the Pixel 5, other current flagship phones we ’ ve tested do well. The new iPhone adds a sting of range over the 11 Pro Max, but many competitors are going a batch farther, hence the disparity in scores. That said, at medium rapid climb ranges at or merely above the native focal length of the iPhone ’ sulfur tele faculty, results are very good .
At closer soar ranges, however, we discover one area in which the iPhone 12 Pro outdoes its larger sibling. Because the 12 Pro phone has a shorter 52 mm-equivalent zoom module, it kicks in earlier in the zoom range than the 12 Pro Max ’ s 65 mm-equivalent television camera. Rather than merge the output from the tele-camera with the wide like some phones do, the iPhone 12 Pro Max simply crops from the across-the-board camera, resulting in lower quality than the 12 Pro over this range. notice : We normally refer to zoom ratios with the main wide television camera as the base, which is why we call this a 2.5x zoom .
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, close-range soar
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, crop, low detail
Apple iPhone 12 Pro, close-range zoom
Apple iPhone 12 Pro, crop, good detail
once the tele-module does kick in, though, it does a better job, outperforming the iPhones 12 Pro and 11 Pro Max, though there is some loss of detail and more randomness than is ideal. The exposure and tinge in both iPhones ’ output are notably better than the Samsung ’ mho downstairs .
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, medium-range zoom
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, crop, good detail
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G, medium-range soar
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G, crop, less detail
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, medium-range zoom
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, crop, less detail, more noise
At those hanker soar ranges, the iPhone 12 Pro Max crops heavily from its tele-sensor and quality drops as steeply ( as you would expect ) .
Wide
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max
41
57
Huawei P50 Pro
Best : Huawei P50 Pro ( 57 )
This iPhone offsets its lackluster Tele score with a strong Wide prove. Apple first introduced a 13 mm-equivalent ultra-wide faculty in the iPhone 11 and 11 Pro, and it continues with that specification here. While not quite equally across-the-board as the ultra-wide lens on the Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra, this television camera still packs in a draw and bests much of the competition in terms of coverage. Image quality is good overall, though a park project is sometimes visible ( see below ), and detail and active scope could be better .
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, ultra-wide
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, crop, good coverage, slight fleeceable hurl
Huawei P40 Pro, ultra-wide
Huawei P40 Pro, crop
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G, ultra-wide
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G, crop
Video scores explained
A device ’ s overall Video score is derived from its performance and results across a scope of attributes in the lapp way as the Photo score. We tested the iPhone 12 Pro Max video manner at 4K resolution, 30 frame per seconds and HDR mode ( Dolby Vision 8.4 ), which achieved the best results overall. We analyzed the Apple ’ s HDR videos using an HDR-compatible display ( Apple XDR Pro Display ), and we analyzed the comparison devices in this test using their native SDR ( standard active range ) manner and SDR displays .
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max achieved a Video score of 113, tying for second locate in our database as of this writing. Its Video sub-scores are as follows : exposure ( 99 ), Color ( 99 ), Autofocus ( 103 ), Texture ( 84 ), Noise ( 102 ), Artifacts ( 78 ), and Stabilization ( 101 ). In this section, we take a closer attend at the device ’ s strengths and weakness for video recording, with some comparisons against its key competitors .
The iPhone 12 Pro Max shoots nicely exposed video down to fairly broken fall levels, but vulnerability does drop off when things get in truth blur. This iPhone does a short better than the 11 Pro Max, but the Huawei P40 Pro maintains more accurate exposure in very dimmed conditions .
Video target exposure comparison
coloring material rendering is by and large pleasant, with decent peel tones both indoors and forbidden. Our testers did notice slender color casts, and white remainder overshoots sometimes happen when lighting quality on the spur of the moment changes, with the call overcompensating for the change before backing up to a more accurate resultant role. Video footage shows broken noise levels down to very low light levels. Detail is besides firm in undimmed light. It dips as the light drops, but at the lowest light levels tested, it ’ s distillery not bad .
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, indoor video recording
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, indoor video recording
Huawei P40 Pro, indoor video
Our lab measurements confirm that noise performance is very good in bright light and then largely tracks the excellent precedent set by the Huawei P40 Pro, with very good operation down to near dark at 1 lux .
Video temporal make noise comparison In this texture chart, we see that the iPhone 12 Pro Max holds onto more detail than the Huawei at the lowest light floor, though the Huawei does better in the middle values .
Video texture comparison
As with stills, the iPhone 12 Pro Max has fast and accurate autofocus when shooting television. The television camera is immediate to smoothly shift focus as required when the subject moves or changes, and chase is effective. That said, our testers did notice the episodic miss in identical low faint when AF would lock on the background quite than on the subject .
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, low-light television
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, low-light television
Huawei P40 Pro, low-light video
Video artifacts are well controlled overall, but our testers noticed some lens flare and color quantization a well as affected interpret in parts of the view with subtle color gradients. possibly thanks to the sensor-shift approach, the iPhone 12 Pro Max ’ s television stabilization system is very effective at keeping shots steady and does not introduce frame fault artifacts .
Conclusion
Apple ’ s latest flagship makes useful advances over its predecessor in about every means. Image quality is very good, autofocus is lightning fast and accurate, detail is high, and colors are generally pleasant. Apple remains a leader in preview performance, so what you see when composing a photograph looks a lot like the final result. Dynamic rate could be better, but mobile photographers should be pleased overall .
This iPhone ’ second weakest link is its lack of long rapid climb capability, something we ’ re seeing more of in flagships from the rival. If reach is overriding to you, then there are other phones that excel in this metric unit ( but none that run io ) .
Video performance overall is excellent, just short of the best we ’ ve seen. wide dynamic stove, good color, low noise, and effective stabilization make this iPhone a good choice for users who prioritize video capabilities .
For mobile photographers committed to the io ecosystem and ready to separate with the brawny buy price, the iPhone 12 Pro Max shouldn ’ thymine disappoint .
Pros
- Fast and accurate autofocus
- Accurate exposure
- Pleasant warm white balance indoors and in low light
- High detail in good light
- Wide dynamic range in videos
- Pleasant color rendering and skin tones in most videos
- Noise is generally well controlled in videos.
- Video stabilization is effective.
Cons
- Dynamic range is limited in stills.
- Noise is often visible in stills, especially in lower light.
- Color can look unnatural in HDR scenes.
- Color quantization, ghosting, hue shift and ringing artifacts in photos
- Exposure instabilities in videos
- White balance casts in low-light videos
- Flare and color quantization artifacts in videos
Please besides have a look at our Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max gallery below. It includes images that our experts shot in a kind of situations and shooting modes for you to view and examine .
i
Shutter speed : 1/1225 secant
ISO : 32
F-number : f/1.6
35mm equivalent focal duration : 26 millimeter
i
i
Shutter accelerate : 1/7 secant
ISO : 2000
F-number : f/1.6
35mm equivalent focal distance : 26 millimeter
i
i
Shutter accelerate : 1/24 securities and exchange commission
ISO : 1000
F-number : f/1.6
35mm equivalent focal length : 26 millimeter
i
i
Shutter rush : 1/14 second
ISO : 2000
F-number : f/1.6
35mm equivalent focal length : 26 millimeter
i
i
Shutter focal ratio : N.A
ISO : N.A
F-number : N.A
35mm equivalent focal length : N.A
i
i
Shutter speed : N.A
ISO : N.A
F-number : N.A
35mm equivalent focal distance : N.A
i
i
Shutter speed : N.A
ISO : N.A
F-number : N.A
35mm equivalent focal duration : N.A
i
i
Shutter amphetamine : N.A
ISO : N.A
F-number : N.A
35mm equivalent focal length : N.A
i
i
Shutter speed : N.A
ISO : N.A
F-number : N.A
35mm equivalent focal length : N.A
i
i
Shutter accelerate : N.A
ISO : N.A
F-number : N.A
35mm equivalent focal length : N.A
i
i
Shutter speed : N.A
ISO : N.A
F-number : N.A
35mm equivalent focal length : N.A
i
Bokeh mode
i
Shutter focal ratio : N.A
ISO : N.A
F-number : N.A
35mm equivalent focal length : N.A
i
Bokeh mood
i
Shutter speed : N.A
ISO : N.A
F-number : N.A
35mm equivalent focal duration : N.A
i
Bokeh mood
i
Shutter speed : N.A
ISO : N.A
F-number : N.A
35mm equivalent focal length : N.A
i
Bokeh manner
i
Shutter speed : N.A
ISO : N.A
F-number : N.A
35mm equivalent focal length : N.A
i
Bokeh mood
i
Shutter speed : N.A
ISO : N.A
F-number : N.A
35mm equivalent focal length : N.A
i
Bokeh manner
A note about image formats for this review: The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max records photograph in the DCI-P3 color space, which Apple displays besides use. DCI-P3 is newer and larger than the sRGB discolor space that most devices use. so to ensure that the images we used in the reappraisal display properly on a wide assortment of browsers and devices, we converted the originals from DCI-P3 to sRGB. This can slightly reduce the affluence of color in some cases from what you would see when viewing the original images on a DCI-P3-calibrated display with allow software. We besides captured the master images using the raw HEIF ( High-Efficiency Image Format ), but then converted them to very high-quality JPEGs for viewing in standard browsers and image edit software. ( HEIF is very similar to JPEG, but provides better compression for exchangeable image quality, so the conversion makes the sample distribution image file sizes larger than they were when photograph. )
We uploaded the iPhone 12 Pro Max HDR video that use Dolby Vision 8.4 technology to YouTube without alteration. We recommend watching them on a compatible display for the best experience. This said, YouTube process may alter the video recording timbre, which is out of our control .
