Car
Audio
Digital camera
Games
Painted Software
Robots
Smart watch
Tech news
ToolsCompact Mainstream Gaming Desktop
For the most depart, Dell took everything I liked about the Inspiron Gaming Desktop ‘s design and made it smaller and better. The older loom was already on the compact side, but it ‘s impressive how petite the G5 Gaming is. The case measures barely 14.5 by 6.7 by 12.1 inches ( HWD ), with the acme and depth peculiarly brusque of standard size .
Our Experts Have Tested
41
Reading: Dell G5 Gaming Desktop Review
Products in the Desktop PCs Category This year
Since 1982, PCMag has tested and rated thousands of products to help you make better buy decisions. ( See how we test. ) 
sure, mATX builds are nothing modern and quite popular with DIY builders and boutique companies, but the big manufacturers tend to stick to life-size towers. The fact that we ‘re getting a smaller, configurable, and well accessible bet on organization at this size on a large scale is a veridical feat. The G5 is bantam enough to fit on clear of your desk, which is far from true of all cases, or in a smaller open space if need be. 
aesthetically, the G5 looks, well, like a bet on desktop, tied more than the Inspiron did. That ‘s about entirely due to the front gore, which features a zig-zagging geometric pattern. It ‘s identical modern, and underscore with a diagonal blue LED that may not be to everyone ‘s like .
One noticeable upgrade, and a calling card of big-league bet on desktops, is the bearing of a glass window on the leave panel. This is a $ 30 option that shows off the inner components, literature with blue LEDs, and makes this budget-friendly system feel that much more high-end. Removing the side dialog box is fabulously easy, with no tools required—giving a few twists to two rear thumbscrews lets you pull the jury away from the case .
The department of the interior is clean if slightly sparse. While the case is made so you can look inside, the components themselves are n’t precisely the most brassy. The CPU fan cooler and GPU are located battlefront and center, but both look very homely. The cable management is by and large bang-up and out of spy, with the exception of a few dangle cables. On the whole, the blue LEDs do a bunch of fleshy raise here, because ( at least in our construct ) the inside is fairly nondescript. For a less expensive system, though, that ‘s all right. arguably more crucial, the G5 is flawlessly assembled and easy to work in despite its compress size .
I mentioned that our physique is n’t the most outstanding, but you can seriously upgrade what ‘s inside when ordering. There are a wide swath of component choices in every class. Our $ 1,169.99 test model, built into the 460W case option, features an Intel Core i7-9700 central processing unit, 16GB of memory, a 512GB solid-state drive, and an Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 graphics menu .
The processor is the strongest partially of this build, a big CPU for gambling, while the GPU is a careful choice—the GTX 1660 is n’t bad, but it ‘s on the less herculean side of Nvidia ‘s hierarchy. hush, it ‘s plenty good adequate for gaming at fully HD resolution, as you ‘ll see subsequently. I besides personally would n’t outfit a gambling background with lone half a terabyte of storehouse, as it will fill up fast. I ‘d recommend pairing a 512GB ( or smaller depending on your budget ) SSD with a larger hard tug to hold most of your game library .
CPU options scale from a Core i3-9100 to the beefy Core i9-9900K, with assorted Core i5 and i7 steps in between. RAM can range from 8GB to 64GB, with room for one or two repositing drives from a single modest SSD to a 3TB combination ( a 1TB SSD plus 2TB hard drive ). The graphics card is what will truly determine which tier of might your organization falls into, and you can choose among the AMD Radeon RX 560X, Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660, GTX 1660 Ti, RTX 2060, RTX 2060 Super, RTX 2070, RTX 2070 Super, and RTX 2080 .
As for ports, the front panel has plenty—arranged vertically along the leave side, you ‘ll find two USB 2.0 ports, a USB 3.0 port, a USB-C port, and microphone and earphone jacks. The exponent push button is besides located here. Around back are four USB 3.1 Type-A ports, two more USB 2.0 ports, an Ethernet laborer, and audio lines. There are besides whatever video recording outputs come with your graphics circuit board, in our case one each for DisplayPort, HDMI, and DVI .
Plenty of All-Around Power
For operation comparison testing, I ‘ve collected the benchmark results of other gaming desktops with like parts and/or price tags. ( unfortunately, the older Dell Inspiron Gaming Desktop is n’t included because it was tested with our former suite of benchmarks. ) hera ‘s a cheat sheet of their names and basic spectacles :
The cheap ( $ 779 as tested ) HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop 690 serves as a baseline. The Editors ‘ Choice NZXT BLD Starter PC Plus besides undercuts the G5 ‘s price at $ 999 as tested, with a lesser CPU but a superior GPU that bodes well for its gambling results .
That brings us to two desktops priced above the Dell. The first is the Lenovo Legion C730 Cube ( $ 1,444 as tested ), an alternative small-form-factor system available in budget or midrange configurations. ultimately, the Digital Storm Lynx ( $ 1,999 as tested ) is the most expensive rival .
Productivity and Storage Tests
PCMark 10 and 8 are holistic performance suites developed by the personal computer benchmark specialists at UL ( once Futuremark ). The PCMark 10 test we run simulate different real-world productivity and content-creation workflows. We use it to assess overall system performance for office-centric tasks such as password process, spreadsheet sour, network browse, and videoconferencing. The test generates a proprietary numeral score ; higher numbers are good. PCMark 8, meanwhile, has a storage subtest that we use to assess the rush of the storage subsystem. It, excessively, yields a proprietorship numeric score ; again, higher numbers are better .
The G5 Gaming does well here, as it should with one of the best processors in the bunch. Rest assured that in summation to gambling, this desktop can be your home office personal computer. Its Core i7 CPU will be able to handle casual tasks for years to come, and its storage is besides alert, on equality with or better than the competition ( most of which is quite quick ). I enjoyed swift boot and load times during my screen .
Media Processing and Content Creation Tests
following is Maxon ‘s CPU-crunching Cinebench R15 quiz, which is fully threaded to make practice of all available central processing unit cores and threads. Cinebench stresses the CPU rather than the GPU to render a building complex picture. The result is a proprietary grudge indicating a personal computer ‘s suitability for processor-intensive workloads .
Cinebench is frequently a well predictor of our Handbrake television editing test, another street fighter, threaded workout that ‘s highly CPU-dependent and scales good with cores and threads. In it, we put a stopwatch on test systems as they transcode a standard 12-minute time of 4K video ( the open source Blender demonstration movie Tears of Steel ) to a 1080p MP4 file. It ‘s a time trial, and lower results are dear .
We besides run a custom Adobe Photoshop trope editing benchmark. Using an early 2018 release of the Creative Cloud version of Photoshop, we apply a series of 10 building complex filters and effects to a standard JPEG test trope. We prison term each operation and, at the end, add up the total performance clock. Lower times are well here. The Photoshop test stresses the CPU, repositing subsystem, and RAM, but it can besides take advantage of most GPUs to speed up the process of applying filters, so systems with potent graphics chips or cards may see a promote .
The Dell continued its strong show, posting the second-best consequence in all three of these hard multimedia tests. That shows consistency, and that its CPU imprison behind merely the cranked-up, unlock version of the lapp chip. We ‘ll get to the gambling results in a here and now, but if you do ignite to medium media creation or editing at home ( whether professionally or as a avocation ), the G5 Gaming Desktop is up to to the job .
Synthetic Graphics Tests
UL ‘s 3DMark suite measures relative graphics muscle by rendering sequences of highly detailed, gaming-style 3D graphics that emphasize particles and lighting. We run two different 3DMark subtests, Sky Diver and Fire Strike, which are suited to different types of systems. Both are DirectX 11 benchmarks, but Sky Diver is more suit to laptops and midrange PCs, while Fire Strike is more demand and made for high-end PCs to strut their stuff. The results are proprietary scores.
next up is another synthetic graphics test, this time from Unigine Corp. Like 3DMark, the Superposition test renders and pans through a detail 3D scene and measures how the system copes. In this case, it ‘s rendered in the party ‘s eponymous Unigine locomotive, offering a different 3D workload scenario than 3DMark, for a moment opinion on the machine ‘s graphic art .
While the Dell ‘s GeForce GTX 1660 performs properly, the NZXT ‘s upticked 1660 Ti performs that much better, as it should, while the last-gen GTX 1060 and the HP ‘s Radeon stave behind. Unlike with the media workloads, I would n’t necessarily recommend our G5 shape for 3D-accelerated tasks if clock is of the perfume, but it is able enough. As for bet on, on to the following tests .
Real-World Gaming Tests
Our synthetic tests are helpful for measuring general 3D aptitude, but it ‘s hard to beat wide retail games for judging gaming operation. Far Cry 5 and Rise of the Tomb Raider are both modern, high-fidelity titles with built-in benchmarks that illustrate how a system handles real-world bet on at diverse settings. We use their utmost graphics-quality presets ( Ultra for Far Cry 5, very eminent for Rise of the Tomb Raider ) at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K resolutions to determine the dulcet spot of accelerate and eye candy for a given system. The results are provided in frames per second gear. Far Cry 5 is DirectX 11-based, while Rise of the Tomb Raider can be flipped to DX12, which we do .
These are the most important results for gamers considering this background, and the news is by and large good. Targeting a arrangement in this price rate means you ‘re probably looking to play at broad HD ( 1,920 by 1,080 ) resolution. not only are 1440p or 4K monitors more expensive, but then is a GPU that can run games smoothly at those resolutions. As such, the crimson bars are the most important here, and the ideal target is 60fps .
The G5 Gaming Desktop easily clears that bar, with room to spare for more arduous moments during gameplay. If its average frame pace sat precisely at 60fps, you ‘d notice the dips, but 80-plus frames per irregular sacrifice you a estimable cushion. As these are two AAA titles, things look even better for less taxing multiplayer titles like Fortnite, Apex Legends, and League of Legends .
On the hale, the GeForce GTX 1660 is a dependable GPU for this scenario, not giving you besides much or excessively little. If your monitor ‘s review rate exceeds 60Hz, the extra juice of a GTX 1660 Ti ( or even something better ) may be the way to go. As you can see, 1440p is much more burdensome ( unless you ‘re approve with 30fps ), and I would n’t recommend 4K gaming on this system. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in the NZXT can pump out 60-plus frames per second more faithfully .
Everything You Need, Nothing You Don’t
The Dell G5 Gaming Desktop is a decent short package all around. It left me with few gripes, virtually none of which involve necessity functionality. It offers solid respect in a space-saving design, looks pretty good for the price, and is both highly configurable when ordering and upgradeable belated. The inwardly is reasonably sparse, and the more I look at the front panel the less I ‘m indisputable everyone will like it, but those are minor downsides .
If you ‘re a semi-serious crippled but not a performance cad, or shopping for a background for your kids to play the most popular games with no mother, this is a bang-up blame, specially if you prefer to stick to one of the major manufacturers. If you do n’t, there ‘s no deny that the NZXT BLD Starter PC Plus offers faster graphics and more repositing for flush less money, retaining our Editors ‘ Choice for the class .
Dell G5 Gaming Desktop
4.0
See It
$ 734.99
at Dell
MSRP $ 589.99
Pros
View More
Cons
The Bottom Line
The Dell G5 Gaming Desktop is a no-fuss entry-level organization with a super-compact purpose, capable gambling performance, and an low-cost monetary value rag .
Like What You’re Reading?
Sign up for Lab Report to get the latest reviews and top merchandise advice delivered right to your inbox .
e-mail
This newsletter may contain advertise, deals, or consort links. Subscribing to a newsletter indicates your accept to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe from the newsletters at any time.
Thanks for signing up !
Your subscription has been confirmed. Keep an center on your inbox !
Sign up for other newsletters
