How Many CPU Cores Do You Need?

Getting Started

well, first you need to ask three identifying questions :

• What are you using the computer for?
• How often are you using it for that task?
• Are you more limited by budget or time?

What Are You Using the Computer For?

pretty straightforward to answer. You ’ re likely build or upgrade because it ’ s not performing ampere well as it needs to, normally in one or more refer tasks. possibly you need it for office work, or bet on, or video recording edit, or 3D render, or 2D photograph editing, or music production—the list goes on ( and on, and on ). Making it a tad more annoying, the software you use can besides have an impingement. Some programs prefer more cores, and others prefer higher clock speeds .

How Frequently Will You Be Performing that Task?

Prioritise your most patronize use cases. If it ’ s a 3D give computer, but you like to play games on it regularly during your downtime, factor that in. if you only edit videos once in a aristocratic moon, however, it credibly isn ’ metric ton important enough to spare much remember .

Are You More Limited by Budget or Time?

Both time and money are limited assets : we don ’ thyroxine have an infinite supply of either. You need to work out whether you spend more money to save some time or frailty versa. Try to achieve some form of symmetry between the two, as you don ’ t need a 12-core processor to do office work ( even if you want to be ‘ future-proof ’ ) and it would be similarly crazy to do advanced video editing on a dual-core processor .

The Use Case

hera ’ s the kernel, the part of the article that you ’ re credibly the most interest in. Below you ’ ll find a series of tasks, and how many cores and/or threads you should be aiming for ( what is a central processing unit ribbon ? ). additionally, for most of the categories, I ’ ll list both a minimum processor and a commend processor. The minimum is what should get you across the cable without it being a frustrating feel. You ’ rhenium detached to purchase more expensive or less expensive CPUs than what I list, as your needs may not 100 % fit the average site for each function case .

Office Work: 2+ Cores

This is pretty straightforward for a computer—it ’ s in truth easy and ( compared to everything else in this list ) it isn ’ deoxythymidine monophosphate going to tax your system much, if at all. Tasks include word process, spreadsheets, emails, accounting software, and possibly some Youtube or Netflix for down-time. You could well get away with a dual-core processor from either Intel or AMD, vitamin a long as you get one with four threads. If future-proofing your system is authoritative to you, feel free to get a quad-core processor. Neither Intel nor AMD sells dual-core desktop CPUs in its stream generation, but the price of current quad-cores is about the like as dual-cores from four years ago .

• • • Intel recommended: i3-10100
    • AMD recommended: R3 3200G

Gaming (High Framerate): 6+ Cores

amazingly ( or possibly unsurprisingly to some ), if your focus is a higher framerate ( e.g. 144Hz rather than 60Hz ) then you ’ ll need a more potent processor than person focusing on a 60Hz 4K gambling system. But … Why is that ? even though the GPU is handling 95 % of the tasks, the central processing unit is inactive processing other complex instructions, such as AI and pathfinding, certain physics, object manipulation, netcode if the game is on-line, and handling the transference of data between RAM, the GPU, peripherals, and the repositing drives. Basically, a higher federal protective service means the CPU is processing more data more frequently. But this kind of process oeuvre doesn ’ metric ton very increase as settlement increases, so it ’ randomness more important for high skeleton rates than for high resolutions. frankincense, I suggest a hexa-core ( six-core ) processor at minimum, with an octa-core ( eight-core ) as a recommendation. Current AAA games take advantage of multi-threading much better than AAA games of tied three years ago, so the more threads the merrier—at least if you wish to future-proof. Please bill that the following Intel processors do not have Hyperthreading ( they have one thread per core ), whereas the AMD processors have SMT ( two threads per core ).

Gaming (High Resolution): 4+ Cores

With a resolution-focused system, you can technically get away with a cheaper CPU since the central processing unit processes the complex instructions less frequently compared to the FPS-focused system ( and since GPUs for 4K are rather costly ) ; however, quad-core midrange processors are cursorily becoming barely, so you ’ re pretty much stuck with a six-core central processing unit anyhow. But, if need be, you can get away with a quad-core central processing unit with eight threads .

• • • AMD minimum: R5 3400G
    • Intel recommended: i5-11600K
    • AMD recommended: R5 5600X

Home Theater: 4+ Cores

Irrespective of the medium used ( phonograph record, storage drives, streaming on-line ), you typically don ’ t need a draw of processing power to watch movies, so the focus for these types of systems is low-wattage processors. This will keep the heat and make noise levels down in the system, which is particularly helpful if using a cramp HTPC case. You can easily use either an AMD or Intel quad-core processor .

• • • Intel recommended: i3-10100
    • AMD recommended: R3 3200G

Video Editing: 6+ Cores

even though your GPU will be engaged when editing video, you still need a herculean processor ( as encoding and decoding uses a bunch of processing power ). GPUs are becoming more relevant to video editing every year, but it ’ randomness still a highly CPU-intensive tax. At any rate, it truly depends on your workload. At a minimum, you should get a hexa-core processor, but an octa-core or more is even better. Clock speed is significant too—aim to get a boost accelerate of at least 4.0GHz .

Photo Editing and Graphic Design: 4+ Cores

Manipulating a single double, or possibly at most respective images, international relations and security network ’ metric ton enormously taxing compared to video editing, but it can silent be a bit of a exercise for a CPU—especially when you add in several layers and effects while working with very-high-resolution images. unfortunately, most photograph edit and image handling software international relations and security network ’ t heavily multi-threaded, frequently only taking advantage of up to four cores. The key here is clock accelerate ( which helps increase instructions per cycle ). One of AMD ’ sulfur or Intel ’ s budget products would be perfectly fine, but some hexa-core processors have higher clock speeds, so they are often a better choice .

3D Rendering and Animation: 4+ Cores

Even though GPU translation is becoming more banal, the CPU is however an important divisor in how promptly a model or liveliness is rendered. Of course, this depends on the platform that you use. But most programs will, even when rendering via the GPU, need a dependable CPU—especially since GPU rendering is ( slightly ) less accurate than CPU rendering, and depending on the workload, could have VRAM limitations. If the software you ’ ra using is chiefly GPU-focused, then a basic quad-core would be perfectly very well. If you prefer to use your CPU, however, then decidedly look at least at the hexa-core options .

Audio Production: 6+ Cores

A fast CPU is vital for serious sound recording output. Unlike 2D and 3D render, you can ’ deoxythymidine monophosphate very take advantage of a graphics batting order to help speed up audio rendering. fortunately, when it comes to using ( most ) audio software, they are pretty ace at taking advantage of multiple cores and higher clock speeds. Because of that, a hexa-core processor is the minimum you should aim for, providing you don ’ metric ton want to wait excessively long for everything to complete. If you want to complete your work even quicker, an octa-core or better is recommended.

Closing Thoughts

Since AMD released the Ryzen series of processors a few years ago, a new earned run average of CPU performance increases has been ushered in. Many of the programs that we used five years ago would scantily make use of more than four, or at most six work cores. But with AMD continually pushing the total of cores on their CPUs, and Intel following suit and respectively increasing their core counts, software has been taking advantage of these extra resources. As you decide on a central processing unit, keep in mind that balance is key. I don ’ triiodothyronine base that the CPU and GPU/SSD/RAM/other component need to cost the lapp, but that they all need to work in concert. Your calculator is only adenine fast as the slowest separate. But, to take that further, your calculator is only adenine fast as it needs to be. That ’ sulfur why it ’ s relatively pleonastic to purchase a $ 800 CPU and a low-tier discrete GPU for any given undertaking. Once you reach a certain point, faster memory, more RAM, and a better GPU will improve your work flow better than a fast CPU. If you want more specific guidance on balancing your build, you can check out the wide balanced human body options in our chief build chart. The above suggestions have all been based on a few factors, such as value for money, time spent completing the tax, and electric potential future habit. I mentioned before that you can purchase a cheaper or pricier central processing unit if you wish—it ’ south all based on what kind of performance you need, and what your budget will allow .

Sources