The 980 comes in the Budget NVMe category and the 970 Evo Plus in the Consumer NVMe category .
Samsung 980 is available in 250GB-1TB variants and the 970 Evo Plus in 250GB-2TB. The read/write travel rapidly is besides reasonably similar in both .
The 970 Evo Plus promises a consecutive read speed up to 3500/3000 MB/s and the 980 can reach up to 3500/3000 MB/s.
even after having a set of similarities, there are hush numerous things to consider before you make your decision. One of them is that 980 doesn ’ t have a DRAM. With that said, let ’ s honkytonk into the actual comparison and see which one should you go with .
Related Comparison: Samsung 980 Pro vs Samsung 970 EVO Plus ( 1TB )
1. Theoretical Specifications
First of all, let ’ s compare the basic specifications disclosed by the company regarding its products .
Specification | SAMSUNG 980 | SAMSUNG 970 Evo Plus |
---|---|---|
Theoretical Read Speed (Max.) | 3,500 MB/s | 3,500 MB/s |
Theoretical Write Speed (Max.) | 3,000 MB/s | 3,300 MB/s |
Random Read (4K, QD32) (Max.) | 500,000 IOPS | 600,000 IOPS |
Random Write (4K, QD32) (Max.) | 480,000 IOPS | 550,000 IOPS |
Form Factor/Interface | M.2 (2280)/PCIe® Gen 3.0 x4, NVMe™ 1.4 | M.2 (2280)/PCIe Gen 3.0 x 4, NVMe 1.3 |
MTBF (Reliability) | 1.5 Million Hours | 1.5 Million Hours |
Warranty | 5 Years | 5 Years |
T.R.I.M. | Supported | Supported |
S.M.A.R.T. | Supported | Supported |
Encryption | AES 256-bit Encryption | AES 256-bit Encryption |
Availability | Check Price | Check Price |
With this table, you can see that both SAMSUNG 980 and SAMSUNG 970 Evo Plus have about exchangeable features. now, let ’ s compare the actual benchmark scores .
2. Synthetic Benchmark Scores (Comparison)
The benchmarks were done under a specific environment on alone 1TB variants of both the products. I have used a laptop with an i5 8th Gen central processing unit and 8GB RAM. The results may vary depending on the specification of your arrangement and the full SSD storage space filled .
Parameter | SAMSUNG 980 (1TB)(100% Empty) |
SAMSUNG 970 Evo Plus (1TB)(100% Empty) |
---|---|---|
Sequential Read Speed (Avg.) | 1,798 MB/s | 2,254 MB/s |
Sequential Write Speed (Avg.) | 1,978 MB/s | 2,039 MB/s |
Random 4K Read (Avg.) | 78.3 MB/s | 87.2 MB/s |
Random 4K Write (Avg.) | 167.7 MB/s | 189.7 MB/s |
You can intelligibly see that the 970 Evo Plus is a winner if we talk about the hardheaded applications under any circumstance. The 970 Evo Plus has a higher consecutive read deoxyadenosine monophosphate well as write accelerate along with the random speeds. This might be happening because of 970 ’ s faster DRAM buffer .
3. Industry Reputation
Both of these SSDs are highly recognized in the calculator storage marketplace. But, if we compare, the 970 Evo Plus has a better repute because of its faster speed and great lastingness. Whether you check anywhere, you will find that the 970 Evo Plus has a huge fanbase. With this, you can say that the 970 Evo Plus is a better companion .
Another matter that contributes to the 970 Evo Plus ’ s huge realization is the Phoenix restrainer. however, the 980 besides has a perfectly configured Samsung Pablo accountant .
4. OS and Software Opening Times
Let ’ s see how well these SSDs do when it comes to opening Windows OS and some other games deoxyadenosine monophosphate well as software. Again, we are using the same personal computer configurations that were used in the celluloid benchmark tests .
OS/Software | Samsung 980 | Samsung 970 EVO Plus |
---|---|---|
Windows 10 (Intel i5 8th Gen) | Ready to use in 24 Seconds | Ready to use in 14 Seconds |
Google Chrome | Within 4 Seconds | Within 3 Seconds |
Adobe Photoshop | ~21 Seconds | ~15 Seconds |
Fortnite | ~42 Seconds | ~29 Seconds |
Tomb Raider | ~25 Seconds | ~19 Seconds |
again, there is not a very huge performance difference when we look at their virtual operation. Both are great in terms of random data processing. Hence, they can contribute to a huge reduction in the software and OS loading times.
Note: The game load prison term is actually the clock time taken by these SSDs to come up with the first base screen after loading .
5. TBW (Terabyte Written)
Terabyte written is a capital parameter to see how long your SSD will last under any circumstances. Let ’ s comparison both of them below .
Samsung 980 | TBW | Samsung 970 Evo Plus | TBW |
---|---|---|---|
250 GB | 150 | 250 GB | 150 |
500 GB | 300 | 500 GB | 300 |
1 TB | 600 | 1 TB | 600 |
– | – | 2 TB | 1,200 |
There is no difference between the TBW limits of both the SSDs. The 970 Evo Plus has a 2TB variant and that ’ s why it has given more TBW restrict .
6. NAND, DRAM, Controller, etc
Both the SSDs are using the lapp Samsung V-NAND 3-bit MLC. But, the 970 Evo Plus has 96 ( 92 ) layers of NAND whereas the 980 has 128 layers .
again, the Samsung 980 is a DRAM-Less SSD but it uses the HMB ( Host Memory Buffer ) and SLC for caching purposes. But, the 970 Evo Plus has its own low-power DDR4 SDRAM for caching .
The configurations of 970 Evo Plus ’ s Phoenix controller are Penta-core, 8-ch, 8-CE/ch. Whereas, the 980 has the Pablo control with four channels .
7. Price (Comparison)
Let ’ s see how much remainder is there between the both when we compare the prices. I am going to pick the prices from the official sources. however, the prices may vary at any time. I would suggest you check alive prices before making the decision .
Samsung 980 is surely an low-cost option to choose between these both. so, if the monetary value is your alone circumstance, you can plainly go for the 980. differently, read my honest impression about this comparison .
Which one should you buy? My Recommendation!
If you are looking for a better speed, I would suggest buying the 970 Evo Plus for sure. however, the TBW, Warranty Period, NAND, and respective other things are exchangeable in both. therefore, going for the 980 would also not go into vain. But, it is assured you will see a big dispute in the actual speed limits of both these products .
If you do not have very high data to read/write speed requirements or you are building a convention sour personal computer, 980 will give you great results for certain at a cheaper price tag. But, if you ask me to choose between these both, I would surely go for the 970 Evo Plus because it has a better repute and its own hoard memory a well .
Thanks for reading !
Also Read: List of Best SSDs to upgrade your laptop ( NVMe/SATA )
Other Great Options to choose from!
Image | Model | Features and Specs | Price |
---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Samsung 970 Evo Plus | Capacity: 250GB – 2TB Interface: PCIe 3.0 Speed: 3500/2500 MB/s Endurance: 1200 TBW |
Check Price! |
![]() |
Crucial P5 | Capacity: 250GB – 2TB Interface: PCIe 3.0 Speed: 3400/3000 MB/s Endurance: 1200 TBW |
Check Price! |
![]() |
Kingston A2000 | Capacity: 250GB – 1TB Interface: PCIe 3.0 Speed: 2200/2000 MB/s Endurance: 600 TBW |
Check Price! |